In essence, with detailed analysis of each piece, it is possible to state that “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty” and “The Necklace” share more similarities than differences, in which these similarities are detrimental in understanding gender roles in a marriage. Also, in terms of literary form, both of them are clearly short stories that use similar tools, such as irony and sarcasm. For instance, both stories raise the issues that can occur in marriage and the characteristic gender roles that are at the base of every marriage. While the characters of these pieces experience different fates and the stories’ plots have dissimilar endings, some similarities can be drawn. The stories were created in different historical periods, in various states of the relationships and in completely different settings. James Thurber’s piece describe a man in the not so common feminine role, while Guy de Maupassant’s piece describes a woman in the usual feminine role. Instead, incorporate the information you’ve identified into your own argument making sure to be cognizant of syntax.James Thurber’s “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty” and Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace” are two significant stories that portray alternate gender roles and the means to cope with those roles. However, do not copy/paste the annotations into your rough draft. Which one of the sources provides the strongest support for your position? Which one offers a counterargument? Which one(s) provide evidence which gives the argument logos credibility? As you hear the conversation in your head, arrange your annotations to begin to visualize the outline for your rough draft. Next, in selecting how to arrange the sources to create a rough draft, imagine the conversation again. It’s still your position – after all, you chose the sources. Even if you had a working thesis beforehand, it’s okay to revise it at this point to more clearly match the debate being presented by your sources. That response sums up the gist of the argument being discussed and makes clear your position on the topic. Now imagine that your best friend just walked up behind you and asked, “Hey, what are you all discussing?” Your one or two sentence answer is your thesis. The topic about which they are speaking is the information contained in your annotation. Once you have done this, arrange the annotations on a table in front of you and imagine that each source is a person standing before you speaking. If your annotated bibliography is printed on continuous pages, cut the annotations apart making certain to leave the bibliographical information with each annotation. Now that you have located sources that either agree or disagree with your position, it’s time to see how those sources inform your thesis. In this exercise, you are becoming part of the academic discussion, or discourse community, on your chosen topic. Now is the time to break out the scissors. While it may be easy for you to state your position and reasons for your argument, you may find it difficult to incorporate your secondary sources into your own draft and still maintain your own voice. A researched position paper is simply an argumentative essay in which you take a position on a chosen topic and defend it with secondary sources. Now that you’ve completed your annotated bibliography, you may find yourself struggling with how to begin the rough draft of the researched position paper assignment. 7.7 From Annotated Bibliography to Rough Draft: How to Develop your Position
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |